南開科技大學圖書館 |

Language: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

南開科技大學

圖書館首頁

編目中圖書申請

登入

回上頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Can controlled processes improve per...

Bulevich, John Brian.

Can controlled processes improve performance in the misinformation paradigm?

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : 單行本
正題名/作者:	Can controlled processes improve performance in the misinformation paradigm?/
作者:	Bulevich, John Brian.
面頁冊數:	98 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 68-06, Section: B, page: 4148.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International68-06B.
標題:	Gerontology. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoeng/servlet/advanced?query=3268011
ISBN:	9780549070450

Can controlled processes improve performance in the misinformation paradigm?
Bulevich, John Brian.

Can controlled processes improve performance in the misinformation paradigm? - 98 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 68-06, Section: B, page: 4148.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Washington University in St. Louis, 2007.

Previous research has demonstrated that when people are allowed to exercise cognitive control (to pass or withhold answers on a memory test), they can improve their performance relative to a forced responding situation (Koriat & Goldsmith, 1996). There has also been renewed interest in metacognition (knowledge about one's own cognitive system) and how subjective experience relates to objective performance in situations that require cognitive control (Nelson & Narens, 1990). Older adults have also been shown to be impaired on a number of memory measures, particularly those involving relatively high cognitive control (Balota, Dolan, & Duchek, 2000). The current experiments sought to explore the relationship between aging, subjective experience, and cognitive control within the misinformation paradigm (Loftus, Miller, & Burns, 1978). Subjects are exposed to an original event (in this case a video) and are later exposed to misleading information regarding details in the video. After a short delay the subjects take a memory test. The memory tests compared performance under conditions of forced responding (subjects must report or select a response) and free responding (subjects can choose to withhold answers). Subjects also provided confidence ratings (0-100) during the forced responding phase. Cued recall, recognition, and the effects of monetary incentives were explored across three experiments. The experiments demonstrated that subjects could improve performance when allowed to pass but improvements were smallest when subjects had been exposed to misleading post-event information. Older adults were particularly impaired by the misinformation. In addition, the relationship between confidence and memory performance was differentially damaged for the older adults after exposure to misleading information. The detrimental effects of the misinformation on both memory performance and metacognitive monitoring were increased with recognition testing compared to cued recall. Monetary incentives resulted only in the increased withholding of items with no accompanying increase in memory accuracy. The results suggest that explanations of cognitive control in memory performance should incorporate both memorial and metamemorial processes.

ISBN: 9780549070450Subjects--Topical Terms:

168436
Gerontology.

Can controlled processes improve performance in the misinformation paradigm?
LDR:03189nmm 2200277 4500 001 1000005326
005 20091102114807.5
008 091102s2007 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9780549070450
035 $a (UMI)AAI3268011
035 $a AAI3268011
040 $a UMI $c UMI{me_controlnum}
100 1 $a Bulevich, John Brian. $3 1000006665
245 1 0 $a Can controlled processes improve performance in the misinformation paradigm?
300 $a 98 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 68-06, Section: B, page: 4148.
500 $a Adviser: Henry L. Roediger, III.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Washington University in St. Louis, 2007.
520 $a Previous research has demonstrated that when people are allowed to exercise cognitive control (to pass or withhold answers on a memory test), they can improve their performance relative to a forced responding situation (Koriat & Goldsmith, 1996). There has also been renewed interest in metacognition (knowledge about one's own cognitive system) and how subjective experience relates to objective performance in situations that require cognitive control (Nelson & Narens, 1990). Older adults have also been shown to be impaired on a number of memory measures, particularly those involving relatively high cognitive control (Balota, Dolan, & Duchek, 2000). The current experiments sought to explore the relationship between aging, subjective experience, and cognitive control within the misinformation paradigm (Loftus, Miller, & Burns, 1978). Subjects are exposed to an original event (in this case a video) and are later exposed to misleading information regarding details in the video. After a short delay the subjects take a memory test. The memory tests compared performance under conditions of forced responding (subjects must report or select a response) and free responding (subjects can choose to withhold answers). Subjects also provided confidence ratings (0-100) during the forced responding phase. Cued recall, recognition, and the effects of monetary incentives were explored across three experiments. The experiments demonstrated that subjects could improve performance when allowed to pass but improvements were smallest when subjects had been exposed to misleading post-event information. Older adults were particularly impaired by the misinformation. In addition, the relationship between confidence and memory performance was differentially damaged for the older adults after exposure to misleading information. The detrimental effects of the misinformation on both memory performance and metacognitive monitoring were increased with recognition testing compared to cued recall. Monetary incentives resulted only in the increased withholding of items with no accompanying increase in memory accuracy. The results suggest that explanations of cognitive control in memory performance should incorporate both memorial and metamemorial processes.
590 $a School code: 0252.
650 4 $a Gerontology. $3 168436
650 4 $a Psychology, Cognitive. $3 1000005612
690 $a 0351
690 $a 0633
710 2 $a Washington University in St. Louis. $3 1000006660
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 68-06B.
790 1 0 $a Roediger, Henry L., III, $e advisor
790 $a 0252
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2007
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoeng/servlet/advanced?query=3268011