南開科技大學圖書館 |

Language: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

南開科技大學

圖書館首頁

編目中圖書申請

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Functional status in MCI, AD, and he...

Mitchell, Joel C.

Functional status in MCI, AD, and healthy older adults: A cross-sectional analysis using the Dementia Severity Rating Scale.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : 單行本
正題名/作者:	Functional status in MCI, AD, and healthy older adults: A cross-sectional analysis using the Dementia Severity Rating Scale./
作者:	Mitchell, Joel C.
面頁冊數:	123 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 69-02, Section: B, page: 1356.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International69-02B.
標題:	Gerontology. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoeng/servlet/advanced?query=3302485
ISBN:	9780549479802

Functional status in MCI, AD, and healthy older adults: A cross-sectional analysis using the Dementia Severity Rating Scale.
Mitchell, Joel C.

Functional status in MCI, AD, and healthy older adults: A cross-sectional analysis using the Dementia Severity Rating Scale. - 123 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 69-02, Section: B, page: 1356.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Rosemead School of Psychology, Biola University, 2007.

Researchers and clinicians have reported a need for well-validated, brief screening measures of activities of daily living. This study investigated the utility of the Dementia Severity Rating Scale (DSRS) with groups of cognitively impaired and non-impaired community dwelling older adults. Of the 320 participants included in this study, 85 (26.6%) were normal controls, 96 (30%) had either Amnestic Mild Cognitive Impairment (n = 50) or Amnestic Mild Cognitive Impairment-multiple domains (n = 46), and the remaining 139 (43.4%) had possible (n = 28) or probable (n = 111) Alzheimer's disease (AD). Each participant was given a thorough examination consisting of a comprehensive standardized neuropsychological battery, assessment of functional status, neurological evaluation, general medical evaluation, imaging, and laboratory analyses. All diagnoses were made based on a consensus of a board-certified neurologist and licensed clinical neuropsychologist.

ISBN: 9780549479802Subjects--Topical Terms:

168436
Gerontology.

Functional status in MCI, AD, and healthy older adults: A cross-sectional analysis using the Dementia Severity Rating Scale.
LDR:03028nmm 2200313 4500 001 1000005404
005 20091102114824.5
008 091102s2007 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9780549479802
035 $a (UMI)AAI3302485
035 $a AAI3302485
040 $a UMI $c UMI{me_controlnum}
100 1 $a Mitchell, Joel C. $3 1000006764
245 1 0 $a Functional status in MCI, AD, and healthy older adults: A cross-sectional analysis using the Dementia Severity Rating Scale.
300 $a 123 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 69-02, Section: B, page: 1356.
500 $a Advisers: Patricia L. Pike; Raphael Ziegler.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Rosemead School of Psychology, Biola University, 2007.
520 $a Researchers and clinicians have reported a need for well-validated, brief screening measures of activities of daily living. This study investigated the utility of the Dementia Severity Rating Scale (DSRS) with groups of cognitively impaired and non-impaired community dwelling older adults. Of the 320 participants included in this study, 85 (26.6%) were normal controls, 96 (30%) had either Amnestic Mild Cognitive Impairment (n = 50) or Amnestic Mild Cognitive Impairment-multiple domains (n = 46), and the remaining 139 (43.4%) had possible (n = 28) or probable (n = 111) Alzheimer's disease (AD). Each participant was given a thorough examination consisting of a comprehensive standardized neuropsychological battery, assessment of functional status, neurological evaluation, general medical evaluation, imaging, and laboratory analyses. All diagnoses were made based on a consensus of a board-certified neurologist and licensed clinical neuropsychologist.
520 $a Results from this study indicated that (a) the DSRS was highly correlated to cognitive and functional status as measured by a battery of widely-used neuropsychological and functional measures, and (b) the control, Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI), and AD groups differed significantly in terms of daily functioning as measured by the DSRS. Additional discriminant analyses revealed that the DSRS was moderately accurate at classifying diagnostic groups. That is, the DSRS accurately identified 81% of the control group, 60% of the MCI group and 78% of the AD group. Post-hoc analyses showed improved efficacy when used in combination with a brief cognitive measure. That is, the DS RS combined with the Consortium to Establish a Registry for Alzheimer's Disease (CERAD) Word List 5-minute delay recall test accurately identified 98% of the control group, 76% of the MCI group, and 82% of the AD group. Implications for clinical practice and proposed areas of future research are discussed.
590 $a School code: 0369.
650 4 $a Gerontology. $3 168436
650 4 $a Psychology, Clinical. $3 1000005545
650 4 $a Psychology, Cognitive. $3 1000005612
690 $a 0351
690 $a 0622
690 $a 0633
710 2 $a Rosemead School of Psychology, Biola University. $3 1000006765
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 69-02B.
790 1 0 $a Pike, Patricia L., $e advisor
790 1 0 $a Ziegler, Raphael, $e advisor
790 $a 0369
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2007
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoeng/servlet/advanced?query=3302485