南開科技大學圖書館 |

Language: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

南開科技大學

圖書館首頁

編目中圖書申請

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Geriatric Education Centers and the ...

Kennedy, Teri Knutson.

Geriatric Education Centers and the academic capitalist knowledge/learning regime.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : 單行本
正題名/作者:	Geriatric Education Centers and the academic capitalist knowledge/learning regime./
作者:	Kennedy, Teri Knutson.
面頁冊數:	327 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 69-04, Section: A, page: 1488.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International69-04A.
標題:	Health Sciences, Education. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3307268
ISBN:	9780549557395

Geriatric Education Centers and the academic capitalist knowledge/learning regime.
Kennedy, Teri Knutson.

Geriatric Education Centers and the academic capitalist knowledge/learning regime. - 327 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 69-04, Section: A, page: 1488.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--The University of Arizona, 2008.

Geriatric Education Centers (GECs), as funded by the Health Resources and Services Administration, promote interdisciplinary geriatric education and training for more than 35 health-professions disciplines including medicine, dentistry, pharmacy, nursing, and social work. GECs are charged with becoming self-sustaining beyond the period of their funding. Sustainability in this application means that a GEC can fund itself through the generation of multiple revenue sources. This study seeks to explore changes in the structure, activities, and relationships of GECs over time in their pursuit of sustainability, and hypothesizes that GECs have shifted from the old economy, or the public good knowledge regime, to the new economy, or the academic capitalist knowledge/learning regime, and from the manufacturing to the networking economy. The theoretical framework of academic capitalism and the knowledge/learning regime will be used as a lens in this qualitative multiple case study.

ISBN: 9780549557395Subjects--Topical Terms:

1000006021
Health Sciences, Education.

Geriatric Education Centers and the academic capitalist knowledge/learning regime.
LDR:02739nmm 2200313 4500 001 1000005200
005 20090508083318.5
008 090508s2008 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9780549557395
035 $a (UMI)AAI3307268
035 $a AAI3307268
040 $a UMI $c UMI{me_controlnum}
100 1 $a Kennedy, Teri Knutson. $3 1000006486
245 1 0 $a Geriatric Education Centers and the academic capitalist knowledge/learning regime.
300 $a 327 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 69-04, Section: A, page: 1488.
500 $a Advisers: Gary Rhoades; Sheila Slaughter.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--The University of Arizona, 2008.
520 $a Geriatric Education Centers (GECs), as funded by the Health Resources and Services Administration, promote interdisciplinary geriatric education and training for more than 35 health-professions disciplines including medicine, dentistry, pharmacy, nursing, and social work. GECs are charged with becoming self-sustaining beyond the period of their funding. Sustainability in this application means that a GEC can fund itself through the generation of multiple revenue sources. This study seeks to explore changes in the structure, activities, and relationships of GECs over time in their pursuit of sustainability, and hypothesizes that GECs have shifted from the old economy, or the public good knowledge regime, to the new economy, or the academic capitalist knowledge/learning regime, and from the manufacturing to the networking economy. The theoretical framework of academic capitalism and the knowledge/learning regime will be used as a lens in this qualitative multiple case study.
520 $a Sources included structured, in-depth, on-site interviews and observations, as well as documentary and virtual (website) evidence. While GECs are engaging in market-like behaviors, creating markets and circuits of knowledge, developing interstitial and intermediary organizations, and expanding managerial capacity, they have been unable to connect with related markets, as these markets lack a profit motive, and have ultimately been unsuccessful in their pursuit of sustainability. Continued federal funding for GECs is justified based on the public good argument that without public encouragement, these services would not be provided by the private sector. The study concludes with recommendations to enhance opportunity structures for GECs.
590 $a School code: 0009.
650 4 $a Health Sciences, Education. $3 1000006021
650 4 $a Gerontology. $3 168436
650 4 $a Education, Higher. $3 165455
690 $a 0350
690 $a 0351
690 $a 0745
710 2 $a The University of Arizona. $b Higher Education. $3 1000006487
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 69-04A.
790 1 0 $a Rhoades, Gary, $e advisor
790 1 0 $a Slaughter, Sheila, $e advisor
790 $a 0009
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2008
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3307268